Key result
Post-TAVI PR prolongation or QRS axis change is not linked to delayed HAVB in pre-existing RBBB.
Why the study?
The 2021 ESC guidelines recommend early pacemaker implantation in pre-existing RBBB patients with PR prolongation or QRS axis change after TAVI, but this recommendation has not been evaluated in balloon-expandable valve recipients.
Does meeting the 2021 ESC guideline criteria (PR prolongation or QRS axis change) predict delayed high-degree atrioventricular block in patients with pre-existing RBBB undergoing TAVI with a balloon-expandable valve?
Cohort (n=188)
No
Does meeting the 2021 ESC guideline criteria (PR prolongation or QRS axis change) predict delayed high-degree atrioventricular block in patients with pre-existing RBBB undergoing TAVI with a balloon-expandable valve?
Significant changes in PR interval or QRS axis post-TAVI with a balloon-expandable valve in patients with pre-existing RBBB were not associated with a heightened risk of delayed high-degree AV block, challenging current ESC guidelines.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Guideline-directed PR prolongation or QRS axis change was not associated with delayed HAVB after BEV-TAVI in pre-existing RBBB; challenges ESC recommendations and leaves validation open.
Aims The 2021 European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend early pacemaker implantation in pre-existing right bundle branch block (RBBB) patients who develop PR prolongation or QRS axis change after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We aimed to evaluate this recommendation in TAVI recipients with a balloon-expandable valve (BEV). Methods and results We retrospectively reviewed 188 pre-existing RBBB patients without pre-existing permanent pacemaker (PPM) who underwent TAVI with a BEV at our institution in 2015–19. Patients who developed high-degree atrioventricular block (HAVB) during TAVI or within 24 h post-TAVI were excluded. Eligible patients were divided according to the guideline-directed criteria (ΔPR interval ≥20 ms and/or QRS axis change). Patients who met the criteria (n = 102, 54.3%), compared with those who did not (n = 86), had a higher prevalence of baseline right axis deviation and were more likely to have received a larger valve with greater oversizing. The 30-day delayed HAVB rate did not differ significantly between the groups (3.9% vs. 4.7%, P = 1.00; odds ratio = 0.84, 95% confidence interval = 0.20–3.45). There was also no significant difference in terms of death (5.0% vs. 8.4% at 1 year; overall log-rank P = 0.94) or a composite of death or PPM implantation (14.8% vs. 16.6% at 1 year; overall log-rank P = 0.94) during follow-up post-TAVI. The majority of PR prolongations (79.4%) and QRS axis changes (52.0%) regressed within the following 24 h. Conclusion The present data did not demonstrate an association of significant changes in PR interval or QRS axis with heightened delayed HAVB risk in BEV recipients with pre-existing RBBB. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Isogai et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Pre-existing right bundle branch block undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (n=188). PR prolongation (ΔPR interval ≥20 ms) and/or QRS axis change vs. No significant PR prolongation or QRS axis change was evaluated on 30-day delayed high-degree atrioventricular block (HAVB) (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.20-3.45, p=1.00). PR prolongation or QRS axis change post-TAVI was not associated with an increased risk of 30-day delayed high-degree atrioventricular block in patients with pre-existing RBBB (OR 0.84; 95% CI 0.20-3.45; P=1.00).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: