Biochemical analysis reveals that GDP-bound dGαo triggers conformational opening of Drosophila Pins by binding its GoLoco motifs, indicating dGαo drives asymmetric cell division.
Drosophila Pins (and its mammalian homologue LGN) play a crucial role in the process of asymmetric cell division (ACD). Extensive research has established that Pins/LGN functions as a conformational switch primarily through intramolecular interactions involving the N-terminal TPR repeats and the C-terminal GoLoco (GL) motifs. The GL motifs served as binding sites for the α subunit of the trimeric G protein (Gα), which facilitates the release of the autoinhibited conformation of Pins/LGN. While LGN has been observed to specifically bind to Gα i ·GDP, Pins has been found to associate with both Drosophila Gα i ( d Gα i ) and Gα o ( d Gα o ) isoforms. Moreover, d Gα o was reported to be able to bind Pins in both the GDP- and GTP-bound forms. However, the precise mechanism underlying the influence of d Gα o on the conformational states of Pins remains unclear, despite extensive investigations into the Gα i ·GDP-mediated regulatory conformational changes in LGN/Pins. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive characterization of the interactions between Pins-GL motifs and d Gα o in both GDP- and GTP-loaded forms. Our findings reveal that Pins-GL specifically binds to GDP-loaded d Gα o . Through biochemical characterization, we determined that the intramolecular interactions of Pins primarily involve the entire TPR domain and the GL23 motifs. Additionally, we observed that Pins can simultaneously bind three molecules of d Gα o ·GDP, leading to a partial opening of the autoinhibited conformation. Furthermore, our study presents evidence contrasting with previous observations indicating the absence of binding between d Gα i and Pins-GLs, thus implying the pivotal role of d Gα o as the principal participant in the ACD pathway associated with Pins.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: