Key result
Omitting postoperative NGT after esophagectomy is linked to similar anastomotic leak rates versus routine placement.
Why the study?
The safety of omitting nasogastric tube decompression after minimally invasive esophagectomy was uncertain.
Does omitting postoperative nasogastric tube decompression improve safety in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy?
Observational (n=124)
Does omitting postoperative nasogastric tube decompression improve safety in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy?
Absolute Event Rate: 7.7% vs 9.2%
Omitting routine nasogastric tube decompression after minimally invasive esophagectomy appears safe and avoids NGT-related complications without increasing leak rates.
May support NGT omission after minimally invasive esophagectomy; leaves open need for randomized confirmation of safety.
A nasogastric tube (NGT) is commonly used in the postoperative period after esophagectomy for decompression of the gastric conduit. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of a minimally invasive esophagectomy without the use of NGT decompression. We performed a retrospective review of 124 patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ninety-eight patients had an NGT placed for postoperative decompression and 26 patients did not. The main outcome measure was postoperative complications in regard to the gastric conduit and esophageal anastomosis. There were 96 males with a mean age of 65 +/- 11 years. Three (3%) of 98 patients with operative NGT placement developed postoperative complications directly related to the NGT, which included perforation of the gastric conduit (n = 1) and perforation of the anastomosis (n = 2). In the 26 patients without operative NGT decompression, one patient (3.8%) had distention of the gastric conduit requiring placement of a NGT under fluoroscopic guidance on postoperative Day 1. There was no significant difference in the leak rate between the groups with NGT decompression compared with the group without NGT decompression (9.2 vs 7.7%, respectively). In conclusion, the use of NGT decompression during minimally invasive esophagectomy can be safely omitted. In cases with postoperative gastric conduit distention, an NGT can be safely placed under fluoroscopic guidance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nguyen et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Minimally invasive esophagectomy (n=124). Omission of postoperative nasogastric tube (NGT) decompression vs. Routine NGT placement for postoperative decompression was evaluated on Leak rate. Omission of postoperative nasogastric tube decompression after minimally invasive esophagectomy was associated with a similar anastomotic leak rate compared to routine NGT placement (7.7% vs 9.2%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: