Key result
Ticagrelor-induced platelet inhibition shows circadian variation, dropping ~15% at 13:00 versus other times.
Why the study?
The impact of circadian variation on ticagrelor-induced platelet inhibition is poorly documented despite known circadian variation in platelet aggregation.
Does ticagrelor-induced platelet inhibition follow a circadian rhythm in healthy volunteers?
Observational (n=25)
Does ticagrelor-induced platelet inhibition follow a circadian rhythm in healthy volunteers?
Ticagrelor-induced platelet inhibition exhibits a circadian rhythm with a nadir at 13:00, suggesting potential time-of-day variations in antiplatelet efficacy that may warrant further study in patients with coronary artery disease.
May influence platelet testing timing; hypothesis-generating for circadian effects in CAD patients.
Aims: The circadian variation of platelet aggregation is well demonstrated. However, whether this has an impact on antiplatelet inhibition therapy is poorly documented. We aimed to observe whether ticagrelor-induced platelet inhibition follows a circadian rhythm. Methods and results: The study included 25 healthy volunteers (11 female; 14 male). Blood samples were collected every 4 h. Ticagrelor was added in vitro at a concentration that provided 50% inhibition of the maximum response using the VerifyNow System Platelet Reactivity Test® thus avoiding any bias induced by circadian gastrointestinal absorption. Platelet aggregation testing was subsequently performed using the VerifyNow. Circadian changes in total platelet count, percentage of platelets inhibition, Von Willebrand activity, and volunteers' physiological parameters were analysed by fitting individuals' data to a sine curve with a 24-h period. Volunteers' physiological parameters [heart rate (b.p.m.), systolic/diastolic blood pressure (mmHg), and body temperature (Celsius)] followed a significant mean circadian pattern of 6 b.p.m. (P < 0.001), 5 mmHg/7 mmHg (P < 0.002), and 0.3°C (P < 0.001), respectively. Ticagrelor-induced platelet inhibition was significantly lower at 13:00 (38.4%) than at any other time (45.2%) (P = 0.018). Percentage of inhibited platelets plotted against time followed a circadian rhythm (P < 0.001), with mean minimum/maximum values at 13:00/02:00, respectively. Von Willebrand activity also followed a circadian pattern (P < 0.001), with an amplitude of 12.24% and a maximum activity at 12:00. Conclusion: Ticagrelor-induced platelet inhibition follows a circadian rhythm, with the lowest mean values achieved at 13:00. These results deserve further studies in patients with coronary artery disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fournier et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Healthy adults (n=25). Time of day (circadian rhythm) vs. Other times of day was evaluated on Percentage of ticagrelor-induced platelet inhibition (p=0.018). Ticagrelor-induced platelet inhibition follows a circadian rhythm, with significantly lower inhibition at 13:00 (38.4%) compared to other times (45.2%) (P=0.018).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: