Key result
A patient-specific 3D printed model successfully guides complex valve-in-valve TAVR to complete symptom resolution.
Why the study?
Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement presents specific anatomic challenges requiring precise procedural planning, and patient-specific 3-dimensional printed models may aid this process.
Does a patient-specific 3-dimensional printed model aid in procedural planning for valve-in-valve TAVR in a patient with bioprosthetic valve failure?
Case Report (n=1)
Does a patient-specific 3-dimensional printed model aid in procedural planning for valve-in-valve TAVR in a patient with bioprosthetic valve failure?
Patient-specific 3D printed models can serve as a valuable tool for procedural planning, education, and patient engagement in complex valve-in-valve TAVR procedures.
May facilitate complex valve-in-valve TAVR planning; hypothesis-generating single-case data leave efficacy unproven.
Background: Aortic stenosis is a common disease of the elderly. Valve replacement with open surgery is the preferred therapy for many patients with low surgical risk. Bioprosthetic valve failure occurs in up to 66% of patients and has a worse prognosis when the mechanism of failure is stenosis compared to regurgitation. Case Report: An 80-year-old female with a medical history of surgical aortic valve replacement, diabetes, chronic back pain, coronary artery disease, and hypertension was referred to the interventional cardiology clinic for heart failure symptoms. A bioprosthetic valve placement that was small for the patient9s size (effective orifice area/body surface area 0.75 cm2/m2) resulted in symptomatic improvement that lasted for 7 years. The patient underwent an aortic valve-in-valve transcatheter valve replacement with excellent outcomes. Preoperative planning involved a patient-specific 3-dimensional printed patient model. Conclusion: In patients at high surgical risk, transcatheter aortic valve replacement is a fundamental pillar of treatment. However, valve-in-valve procedures have specific anatomic challenges, such as the risk of coronary artery obstruction and the limitation of valve expansion inside a rigid bioprosthetic valve frame. In those difficult cases, interventional cardiologists must make precise decisions regarding the approach. Three-dimensional models can be printed with the patient9s specific measurements. This approach represents truly personalized medicine and can serve as a tool for procedural planning, education of the health personnel involved in the case, and patient and family engagement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Soto et al. (2020) conducted a case report in Aortic stenosis and bioprosthetic valve failure (n=1). Patient-specific 3-dimensional printed model for procedural planning was evaluated on Procedural success and symptom resolution. A patient-specific 3-dimensional printed model successfully guided a complex valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement, resulting in complete symptom resolution at 30 days.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: