Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
• Sr 1 - x La x Fe 12 O 19 (x = 0.1, 0.3, and 0.6) hexaferrite were successfully obtained by spark-plasma sintering (SPS) from as-calcined powders. • Finite element simulation of the SPS process. • Rietveld refinement of the samples obtained under SPS condition and with different La-content. • The Sr 1 - x La x Fe 12 O 19 is dominant phase and the contribution of secondary phases does not reduce the coercivity of the system. • First-order reversal curves (FORC) revealed details of the magnetic behavior of the samples. Polycrystalline samples of Sr 1− x La x Fe 12 O 19 ( x = 0.1, 0.3, and 0.6) hexaferrite were prepared by spark-plasma sintering (SPS) and its structural and magnetic properties have been investigated. The SPS process were performed under vacuum, at 900 °C , and in only 5 min. X-ray powder diffraction patterns showed that before SPS sintering samples are composed by several phases where the SrFe 12 O 19 (SrM) is not higher than 12 % . From Rietveld refinement method, we have found that after SPS process the content of SrM phase increased, in mean, up to 68 % . However, it was found the presence of secondary phase such as α -Fe 2 O 3 and LaFeO 3 ( % ) whose phase content also vary with increasing the La-content. A finite element simulation model were used to study the temperature evolution within the sample during the SPS treatment. Magnetization measurements at room temperature yielded values of saturation magnetization between ~ 43 to ~ 27 emu/g and coercivities, H cB , in the range 3.11 to 2.88 kOe with increasing x . The influence and possible interaction between detected magnetic phases was studied by means of first-order reversal curves (FORCs) measurements. Results indicated that magnetic behavior of the La-doped strontium hexaferrites obtained by SPS technique are analogous a system composed of a broad distribution particles that are exchange-coupled with a certain number of other of neighboring particles. From FORC maps the coercivity profiles of the studied samples were extracted. The asymmetric behavior of these profiles were related to a broad distribution of the particle size and/or the influence of the secondary magnetic phases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Govea‐Alcaide et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: