Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Anisotropy in the lower mantle is studied by measuring the difference of the splitting parameter τ (the delay time between two split shear‐waves) between the two phases SKS and P660s. These two phases are the P‐to‐S conversion waves at the CMB and the 660‐km discontinuity, and therefore are affected by the accumulated anisotropy of whole and upper mantle, respectively. An approximately 0.4 sec time difference of τ value between SKS and P660s is observed at the station HIA, a CDSN broadband seismic station located in central China. This difference is supposed to be caused by the accumulated anisotropy in the lower mantle beneath the eastern Asia region. If the anisotropy is assumed to be distributed uniformly in the whole lower mantle or a lowermost 300‐km D” layer, the resulted anisotropy will be 0.08% and 0.5%, respectively. However, the real intensity of the existing anisotropy in the studied region may be much larger than the above values, depending on its size and location in the lower mantle.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iidaka et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: