Genomic surveillance study uncovers extensive mobile genetic elements and tetracycline resistance in Clostridium perfringens type A isolates, highlighting the need for enhanced pathogen tracking.
OBJECTIVES: To explore a comprehensive genomic analysis of Clostridium perfringens type A strains from diverse regions in China, investigating their virulence genes, antibiotic resistance genes, and mobile genetic elements (MGEs) to inform strategies for infection control and resistance gene surveillance. METHODS: We conducted whole-genome sequencing on 168 C. perfringens type A strains from nine provinces in China (2016-2021). Previously described alpha-toxin (PLC) sequence typing for C. perfringens was used for comparisons with core genome multilocus sequence typing. Virulence genes, antibiotic resistance genes, and MGEs, including CRISPR/Cas, prophages, and plasmids of C. perfringens type A were investigated by molecular and bioinformatic methods. RESULTS: PLC type II contained the largest number of isolates (n = 44). The same type strains were largely clustered in the same branches. Tetracycline resistance genes tetA(P) and tetB(P) had high prevalence in type A isolates. 395 prophages were predicted including 265 "incomplete," 55 "questionable," and 75 "intact" prophages. CRISPR/Cas systems were more common in isolates from humans (63 %) than in those from animals and food (52 % and 46 %, respectively). Fifty-seven percent of strains likely had the tcp conjugation locus (tcpC to tcpH), and 12 isolates likely carried the conjugative pCW3 plasmid. Type A strains exhibited fewer plasmid-encoded toxins. CONCLUSIONS: cgMLST analysis demonstrated some micro-evolution and regional transmission trends within type A, which exhibited partial correlated with PLC typing. This study highlights the need for enhanced surveillance of antimicrobial resistance and pathogenicity-associated MGEs in C. perfringens type A.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: