Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The binding of NADH and NAD+ to the human liver cytoplasmic, E1, and mitochondrial, E2, isozymes at pH 7.0 and 25 degrees C was studied by the NADH fluorescence enhancement technique, the sedimentation technique, and steady-state kinetics. The binding of radiolabeled [14C]NADH and [14C]NAD+ to the E1 isozyme when measured by the sedimentation technique yielded linear Scatchard plots with a dissociation constant of 17.6 microM for NADH and 21.4 microM for NAD+ and a stoichiometry of ca. two coenzyme molecules bound per enzyme tetramer. The dissociation constant, 19.2 microM, for NADH as competitive inhibitor was found from steady-state kinetics. With the mitochondrial E2 isozyme, the NADH fluorescence enhancement technique showed only one, high-affinity binding site (KD = 0.5 microM). When the sedimentation technique and radiolabeled coenzymes were used, the binding studies showed nonlinear Scatchard plots. A minimum of two binding sites with lower affinity was indicated for NADH (KD = 3-6 microM and KD = 25-30 microM) and also for NAD+ (KD = 5-7 microM and KD = 15-30 microM). A fourth binding site with the lowest affinity (KD = 184 microM for NADH and KD = 102 microM for NAD+) was observed from the steady-state kinetics. The dissociation constant for NAD+, determined by the competition with NADH via fluorescence titration, was found to be 116 microM. The number of binding sites found by the fluorescence titration (n = 1 for NADH) differs from that found by the sedimentation technique (n = 1.8-2.2 for NADH and n = 1.2-1.6 for NAD+).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ambroziak et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: