Key result
Watch-type tonometry weakly correlates with polysomnography in AF patients, predicting elevated AHI with 0.72 AUC.
Why the study?
The accuracy of watch-type peripheral arterial tonometry for home sleep apnea testing in atrial fibrillation patients undergoing catheter ablation was not adequately established.
Does watch-type peripheral arterial tonometry accurately estimate the apnea-hypopnea index compared to polysomnography in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation?
Observational (n=464)
No
Does watch-type peripheral arterial tonometry accurately estimate the apnea-hypopnea index compared to polysomnography in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.72 (95% CI 0.67-0.76)
Home sleep apnea testing with watch-type peripheral arterial tonometry may underestimate sleep apnea severity compared to polysomnography in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation, potentially missing indications for CPAP therapy.
WP may aid convenient SA screening pre-AF ablation; leaves open diagnostic accuracy versus PSG pending prospective validation.
Background: Sleep apnea (SA) is highly prevalent and should be treated in patients referred for catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF). Watch-type peripheral arterial tonometry (WP) for home SA testing has demonstrated a high correlation of the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) with Polysomnography (PSG), but the evidence of its accuracy in AF patients is not adequate. Methods: This study was conducted under a retrospective, single-center, observational design. We included 464 consecutive AF patients (age 65 ± 11 years, 76.5% male, 45.0% paroxysmal-AF) who received both WP and PSG during the periprocedural period of the CA. We compared the AHI using the WP (WP-AHI) to that using PSG (PSG-AHI). Results: = .48). Among 325 patients with a WP-AHI < 30, 116 (35.7%) exhibited a PSG-AHI ≥ 30. Only 12.5% of the patients were indicated for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment only by the WP-AHI, while 70.9% were indicated for CPAP by the PSG-AHI according to the Japanese health insurance system. The best cut-off value of the WP-AHI was 18.1 to predict a PSG-AHI ≥ 20 with an area under the curve of 0.72 (95% confidence interval, 0.67-0.76). Conclusions: The WP-AHI and PSG-AHI were weakly correlated in AF patients receiving CA. About one-third of the patients with moderate SA using the WP was diagnosed with severe SA evaluated by PSG. The majority required PSG for the CPAP indication.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tanaka et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation and sleep apnea (n=464). Watch-type peripheral arterial tonometry (WP) vs. Polysomnography (PSG) was evaluated on Accuracy of WP-AHI to predict PSG-AHI ≥ 20 (AUC 0.72, 95% CI 0.67-0.76). Watch-type peripheral arterial tonometry and polysomnography were weakly correlated in AF patients, with WP-AHI predicting PSG-AHI ≥ 20 with an AUC of 0.72 (95% CI 0.67-0.76).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: