Energy profiles for olefin epoxidation with the cationic [Mn(acacen‘)] + catalyst (acacen‘ = - O(CH) 3 N−C 2 H 4 −N(CH) 3 O - ) have been calculated using pure (BP86) and hybrid (B3LYP) density functional methodologies. For the reaction, triplet and quintet energy hyper surfaces have been considered. The BP86 calculations allow for a rationalization of a reaction occurring under spin conservation. On the other hand, the B3LYP calculations suggest a reaction profile involving an early spin-crossing step, strongly supporting two-state reactivity. Further, the BP86 calculations suggest the existence of a metallacycle as possible reaction intermediate, a proposition not supported by the B3LYP approach. The two different computational approaches result not only in a quantitatively, but also in a qualitatively different description of the epoxidation reaction. This in turn implies different models for chirality transfer associated with related reactions employing chiral catalytic systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cavallo et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: