Key result
VAD implantation achieves ~76% survival in children and young adults with neuromuscular diseases.
Why the study?
Neuromuscular diseases are frequently complicated by progressive cardiomyopathy leading to advanced heart failure, but evidence on indications and outcomes of ventricular assist device implantation in children and young adults is limited.
What are the clinical outcomes of ventricular assist device implantation in children and young adults with neuromuscular diseases?
Systematic Review (n=37)
What are the clinical outcomes of ventricular assist device implantation in children and young adults with neuromuscular diseases?
VAD implantation in children and young adults with neuromuscular diseases is feasible with 75.7% survival at last follow-up, though morbidity from bleeding and infection remains substantial.
Supports VAD feasibility in select pediatric neuromuscular disease patients; leaves open optimal selection and prospective outcome data.
Background Neuromuscular diseases (NMDs) are frequently complicated by progressive cardiomyopathy leading to advanced heart failure. Ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation has emerged as a potential option in selected pediatric and young adult patients, but evidence on indications and outcomes is limited. We aimed to systematically review evidence on VAD implantation in children and young adults with NMDs, focusing on device strategies and clinical outcomes. Methods Systematic review following Cochrane methodology and reported per the PRISMA guidelines. Six major biomedical databases were searched from inception to October 1, 2025. Studies including patients aged ≤25 years with NMDs undergoing VAD implantation were eligible. The primary outcome was clinical status at last reported follow-up, classified as alive on device support, alive after heart transplantation (HT), or deceased. Results Six retrospective studies comprising 37 patients were included. Duchenne muscular dystrophy was the most common diagnosis (48.6%). Destination therapy was the most frequently reported strategy (45.9%), followed by bridge-to-transplant (37.8%) and bridge-to-decision (16.2%). At last follow-up, 75.7% were alive: 43.2% on device support and 32.4% after undergoing HT; 24.3% had died. Complications were common, most frequently bleeding and infection, whereas neurologic events were the leading cause of death. Reporting of functional outcomes and quality of life was sparse and heterogeneous. Conclusions Evidence on VAD use in this population is limited to small retrospective cohorts. Although most patients were alive at last reported follow-up, morbidity remains substantial and patient-centered outcomes are poorly characterized. Prospective multicenter studies with standardized outcome definitions are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salmè et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Neuromuscular diseases with advanced heart failure (n=37). Ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation was evaluated on Clinical status at last reported follow-up, classified as alive on device support, alive after heart transplantation (HT), or deceased. Ventricular assist device implantation in children and young adults with neuromuscular diseases resulted in 75.7% survival at last follow-up, with 43.2% on device support and 32.4% post-transplant.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: