Key result
High-resistant starch fails to lower systolic blood pressure compared to low-resistant starch.
Why the study?
The link between resistant starch intake, autonomic regulation, and cardiovascular outcomes in women with metabolic syndrome features remains unclear.
Does high-resistant starch intake reduce systolic blood pressure and improve autonomic function in women aged ≥ 40 years with ≥2 metabolic syndrome components?
RCT (n=30)
Double-blind
Does high-resistant starch intake reduce systolic blood pressure and improve autonomic function in women aged ≥ 40 years with ≥2 metabolic syndrome components?
High-resistant starch intake may offer exploratory signals of reduced systolic blood pressure and autonomic adaptation, but between-group differences were not statistically significant in this pilot study.
High-resistant starch lacks between-group superiority for systolic BP reduction; hypothesis-generating for autonomic effects in larger metabolic syndrome trials.
ObjectiveResistant starch is associated with metabolic benefits, but whether autonomic regulation links resistant starch intake to cardiovascular outcomes remains unclear. This study examined the effects of resistant starch on heart rate variability and blood pressure in women with features of metabolic syndrome.MethodsIn this 8-week randomized, double-blind pilot trial, 30 women (aged ≥ 40 years) with ≥2 metabolic syndrome components were assigned to a high-resistant starch or low-resistant starch group. The primary outcome was the change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to week 8. Secondary outcomes included heart rate variability-related autonomic parameters, whereas other blood pressure and metabolic syndrome-related variables were evaluated as exploratory outcomes.ResultsSystolic blood pressure decreased significantly within the high-resistant starch group (p = 0.037), although the baseline-adjusted between-group difference was not statistically significant. This change occurred without corresponding improvements in body mass index or triglyceride levels. Group-level heart rate variability differences did not reach statistical significance; however, exploratory analyses suggested a favorable directional pattern in global heart rate variability composite scores among participants with lower baseline autonomic activity (p = 0.06).ConclusionsHigh-resistant starch intake demonstrated exploratory signals of reduced systolic blood pressure and heart rate variability-related autonomic adaptation, particularly among participants with lower baseline autonomic activity. These findings warrant confirmation in adequately powered randomized controlled trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Risk of metabolic syndrome (n=30). High-resistant starch vs. Low-resistant starch was evaluated on Change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to week 8. High-resistant starch decreased systolic blood pressure within the group (p=0.037), but the baseline-adjusted between-group difference versus low-resistant starch was not statistically significant.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: