Key result
Frailty linked to ~41% higher one-year mortality risk in ICU patients.
Why the study?
Frailty scoring has potential to facilitate more informed decisions in the intensive care unit, but its relationship with outcomes must be tested extensively.
Does frailty increase the risk of one-year mortality in intensive care unit patients?
Cohort (n=400)
No
Does frailty increase the risk of one-year mortality in intensive care unit patients?
Hazard Ratio: 1.41 (95% CI 1–1.98)
p-value: p=0.0497
Frailty is a significant independent predictor of one-year mortality and increased healthcare utilization in intensive care unit patients.
Frailty assessment may refine ICU prognostication; leaves open whether it should guide treatment decisions.
INTRODUCTION: Frailty is a syndrome of decreased reserve and heightened vulnerability. Frailty scoring has potential to facilitate more informed decisions in the intensive care unit. To validate this, its relationship with outcomes must be tested extensively. This study aimed to investigate frailty's impact on adverse outcomes after intensive care unit admission, primarily one-year mortality. METHODS: This single-centre retrospective observational cohort study examined prospectively collected data from 400 intensive care unit patients. Frailty was assessed using the Clinical Frailty Scale and defined as Clinical Frailty Scale ≥ 5. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses tested the relationships of frailty, covariates and outcomes. RESULTS: Of 400 eligible patients, 111 (27.8%) were frail and 289 (72.3%) were non-frail. Compared to non-frail patients, frail patients were older (62 vs. 56, p < 0.001) and had higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores (22 vs. 19, p < 0.001). Females were more likely to be frail than males (34.1% vs. 22.9% frail, p = 0.018). Frail patients were less likely to survive the intensive care unit (p = 0.03), hospital (p = 0.003) or to one year (p < 0.001). Frailty significantly increased one-year mortality hazards in unadjusted analyses (hazard ratio 1.96; 95% confidence interval 1.41-2.72; p < 0.001) and covariate adjusted analyses (hazard ratio 1.41; 95% confidence interval 1.00-1.98; p = 0.0497). Frail patients had more hospital admissions (p = 0.014) and longer hospital stays within both one year before (p = 0.002) and one year after intensive care unit admission (p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty was common and associated with greater age, female gender, higher sickness severity and more healthcare use. Frailty was significantly associated with greater risks of mortality in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses. Frailty scoring is a promising tool which could improve decision making in intensive care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hewitt et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Intensive care unit patients (n=400). Frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale ≥ 5) vs. Non-frail (Clinical Frailty Scale < 5) was evaluated on One-year mortality (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.00-1.98, p=0.0497). Frailty was significantly associated with an increased risk of one-year mortality among intensive care unit patients (adjusted HR 1.41; 95% CI 1.00-1.98; p=0.0497).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: