Key result
Proposed triple oscillator hypothesis links mammalian breathing phases to preBötC, PiCo, and pFL networks.
Why the study?
The mechanisms underlying respiratory rhythm generation involving distinct oscillatory neuronal networks for each breathing phase remain to be fully integrated and understood.
This review summarizes the triple oscillator hypothesis of respiratory rhythm generation, detailing the roles of the preBötC, PiCo, and pFL networks.
Breathing is vital for survival but also interesting from the perspective of rhythm generation. This rhythmic behavior is generated within the brainstem and is thought to emerge through the interaction between independent oscillatory neuronal networks. In mammals, breathing is composed of three phases – inspiration, post-inspiration, and active expiration – and this article discusses the concept that each phase is generated by anatomically distinct rhythm-generating networks: the preBötzinger complex (preBötC), the post-inspiratory complex (PiCo), and the lateral parafacial nucleus (pF L ), respectively. The preBötC was first discovered 25 years ago and was shown to be both necessary and sufficient for the generation of inspiration. More recently, networks have been described that are responsible for post-inspiration and active expiration. Here, we attempt to collate the current knowledge and hypotheses regarding how respiratory rhythms are generated, the role that inhibition plays, and the interactions between the medullary networks. Our considerations may have implications for rhythm generation in general.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anderson et al. (2017) conducted a review in Respiratory rhythm generation. The authors propose a triple oscillator hypothesis where the three phases of mammalian breathing—inspiration, post-inspiration, and active expiration—are generated by the preBötC, PiCo, and pFL networks, respectively.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: