In Brief Objectives: The authors describe the localization and speech-understanding abilities of a patient fit with bilateral cochlear implants (CIs) for whom acoustic low-frequency hearing was preserved in both cochleae. Design: Three signals were used in the localization experiments: low-pass, high-pass, and wideband noise. Speech understanding was assessed with the AzBio sentences presented in noise. Results: Localization accuracy was best in the aided, bilateral acoustic hearing condition, and was poorer in both the bilateral CI condition and when the bilateral CIs were used in addition to bilateral low-frequency hearing. Speech understanding was best when low-frequency acoustic hearing was combined with at least one CI. Conclusions: The authors found that (1) for sound source localization in patients with bilateral CIs and bilateral hearing preservation, interaural level difference cues may dominate interaural time difference cues and (2) hearing-preservation surgery can be of benefit to patients fit with bilateral CIs. The authors describe the localization and speech-understanding abilities of a bilateral cochlear implant (CI) patient for whom low-frequency acoustic hearing was preserved in “both” implanted cochlea. This is the first report on the localization ability of a CI patient with access to both interaural level difference cues and interaural time difference cues. The authors find that interaural level difference cues may dominate interaural time difference cues in patients with access to both set of cues. Speech understanding can be improved for bilateral CI patients by having at least one ear with low-frequency acoustic hearing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dorman et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: