Objectives: To evaluate speech-in-noise and spatial listening performance in patients with tinnitus by examining the potential contributions of top-down and bottom-up processes. Design: Thirty-one patients with tinnitus and 31 age-matched controls without tinnitus (participants with normal hearing), aged 18 to 60 years, underwent audiological evaluation. All participants completed the Listening in Spatialized Noise–Universal Test to assess speech-in-noise performance under different spatial conditions and cognitive tests (Serial Digit Learning and Stroop) to assess attention and memory. Results: Hearing thresholds did not differ significantly between groups ( p > 0.05), although a significant main effect of frequency was observed ( p < 0.001). Participants with tinnitus demonstrated poorer speech-in-noise performance than controls across both colocated and spatially separated listening conditions [ F (1,60) = 12.53, p = 0.001], whereas spatial advantage ( t = 1.08, p = 0.28) and cognitive performance (all p > 0.05) were comparable between groups. Conclusions: Patients with tinnitus demonstrated poorer speech-in-noise performance than controls in both spatially separated and colocated listening conditions. Spatial advantage and cognitive test performance were comparable between groups, suggesting that the between-group difference in speech-in-noise performance was evident across both listening conditions rather than being limited to spatial cue utilization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sevmez et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: