Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) and compare its outcomes in esophageal and cardial submucosal tumors (SMTs) of the muscularis propria (MP) layer. METHODS: resection rate, complete resection rate, residual rate, and recurrence rate were calculated to evaluate the effectiveness of STER, and the complication rate was recorded to evaluate its safety. Effectiveness and safety outcomes were compared between esophageal and cardial SMTs. The most common complications for esophageal SMTs were gas-related complications and fever, while mucosal injury was the most common for cardial SMTs. CONCLUSION: STER is an effective and safe therapy for GI SMTs of the MP layer. Its effectiveness and safety are comparable between SMTs of the esophagus and cardia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Du et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: