Key result
Specific MRI-derived body composition subphenotypes are linked to ~4-fold higher CVD risk.
Why the study?
Fat distribution is more informative than overall body size for characterizing health states, but distinct body composition subphenotypes and their associations with cardiovascular risk are not well defined.
Observational (n=299)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: For characterizing health states, fat distribution is more informative than overall body size. We used population-based whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to identify distinct body composition subphenotypes and characterize associations with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. METHODS: Bone marrow, visceral, subcutaneous, cardiac, renal, hepatic, skeletal muscle and pancreatic adipose tissue were measured by MRI in n = 299 individuals from the population-based KORA cohort. Body composition subphenotypes were identified by data-driven k-means clustering. CVD risk was calculated by established scores. RESULTS: We identified five body composition subphenotypes, which differed substantially in CVD risk factor distribution and CVD risk. Compared to reference subphenotype I with favorable risk profile, two high-risk phenotypes, III&V, had a 3.8-fold increased CVD risk. High-risk subphenotype III had increased bone marrow and skeletal muscle fat (26.3 % vs 11.4 % in subphenotype I), indicating ageing effects, whereas subphenotype V showed overall high fat contents, and particularly elevated pancreatic fat (25.0 % vs 3.7 % in subphenotype I), indicating metabolic impairment. Subphenotype II had a 2.7-fold increased CVD risk, and an unfavorable fat distribution, probably smoking-related, while BMI was only slightly elevated. Subphenotype IV had a 2.8-fold increased CVD risk with comparably young individuals, who showed high blood pressure and hepatic fat (17.7 % vs 3.0 % in subphenotype I). CONCLUSIONS: Whole-body MRI can identify distinct body composition subphenotypes associated with different degrees of cardiometabolic risk. Body composition profiling may enable a more comprehensive risk assessment than individual fat compartments, with potential benefits for individualized prevention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grune et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Cardiometabolic risk (n=299). High-risk body composition subphenotypes (III and V) vs. Reference subphenotype I was evaluated on Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk (3.8-fold increased risk). Whole-body MRI identified distinct body composition subphenotypes, with high-risk phenotypes III and V demonstrating a 3.8-fold increased cardiovascular disease risk compared to reference phenotype I.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: