Key result
External annuloplasty in BAV repair is linked to ~20% greater freedom from AR versus subcommissural annuloplasty.
Why the study?
The optimal aortic annulus stabilization technique for repair of incompetent bicuspid aortic valve remains uncertain, necessitating prospective comparison of external versus subcommissural annuloplasty.
Does external complete annuloplasty improve echocardiographic hemodynamics compared to subcommissural annuloplasty in patients undergoing bicuspid aortic valve repair?
Does external complete annuloplasty improve echocardiographic hemodynamics compared to subcommissural annuloplasty in patients undergoing bicuspid aortic valve repair?
Absolute Event Rate: 96% vs 76%
p-value: p=.05
External complete annuloplasty during bicuspid aortic valve repair provides superior medium-term echocardiographic hemodynamics and valve competence compared to subcommissural annuloplasty.
Supports external annuloplasty for better hemodynamics in bicuspid aortic valve repair; hypothesis-generating, needs randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: The incompetent bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) can be repaired using various techniques. This study presents a prospective comparison of external and subcommissural aortic annuloplasty. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients (38 males, age: 43.9 ± 15.8 years) with BAV insufficiency with or without aortic dilatation underwent valve repair in a single institution. They were prospectively allocated to one of two groups based on the aortic annulus stabilization technique: 25 patients were operated on using the subcommissural annuloplasty (SCA) and 25 using the external complete annuloplasty (EA). Transthoracic echocardiography was performed in all patients before the operation and 1 and 3 years after the operation. Moreover, mortality and morbidity at 7 years were evaluated. RESULTS: In prospective echocardiographic comparison, EA was associated with smaller diameter of the aortic annulus (24.1 ± 2.6 mm vs. 25.8±2.1 mm, p < .05) and lower mean and peak transvalvular gradients (7 ± 4 mmHg vs. 13 ± 4 mmHg, p = .02 and 15.3 ± 9.7 mmHg vs. 20.7 ± 5.6 mmHg, p = .03, respectively). No patients died or required reoperation due to recurrent insufficiency at 6,81 (interquartile range-0,17) years after the operation. The Kaplan-Meier actuarial freedom from aortic regurgitation (AR) grade =2 or gradient > 20 mmHg at 35.1 ± 3.6 months years was 96% (24 out of 25) for patients who had external annuloplasty and amounted to 76% (19 out of 25) for those who had SCA, p = .05). CONCLUSIONS: External annuloplasty performed during repair of the BAV is associated with better hemodynamics at medium-term follow-up compared to SCA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jasiński et al. (2021) studied Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) insufficiency (n=50). External complete annuloplasty (EA) vs. Subcommissural annuloplasty (SCA) was evaluated on Freedom from aortic regurgitation (AR) grade =2 or gradient > 20 mmHg at 35.1 ± 3.6 months (p=.05). External annuloplasty during bicuspid aortic valve repair improved 3-year freedom from aortic regurgitation grade 2 or gradient >20 mmHg compared to subcommissural annuloplasty (96% vs 76%, p=.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: