Key result
Low-dose aspirin is linked to ~£50 higher annual NHS costs vs nonusers, driven by complications.
Why the study?
The cost to the NHS of prescribed low-dose aspirin including supply and management of upper gastrointestinal and renal toxicity was not well defined.
Does prescribed low-dose aspirin increase healthcare costs compared to nonuse due to supply and management of toxicity?
Population
17,244 new users of dispensed aspirin each with 10 matched comparators from Tayside Scotland
Comparison
Prescribed low-dose aspirin users vs matched aspirin nonusers
Design
Population-based observational cohort study
Follow-up
2.53 years
Authors
Loading...
May add hidden NHS costs from complications; leaves open net value of low-dose aspirin in primary prevention.
Cohort (n=189,684)
Does prescribed low-dose aspirin increase healthcare costs compared to nonuse due to supply and management of toxicity?
The true cost of low-dose aspirin prophylaxis to the healthcare system is 6 to 25 times higher than the drug cost alone due to dispensing fees and the management of gastrointestinal and renal adverse effects.
Morant et al. (2003) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular prophylaxis (n=189,684). Low-dose aspirin vs. Aspirin nonusers was evaluated on Excess costs to the NHS per year. Low-dose aspirin use cost the NHS an additional 49.86 UK pounds per year compared to nonusers, primarily due to dispensing and complication management costs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: