Key result
Norepinephrine cuts bradycardia ~94% vs phenylephrine while maintaining comparable blood pressure during caesarean section.
Why the study?
Phenylephrine is the vasopressor of choice for spinal anaesthesia–induced maternal hypotension but causes reflex bradycardia and decreased cardiac output, effects potentially less with norepinephrine.
Does norepinephrine infusion improve maternal hemodynamics compared to phenylephrine in parturients undergoing caesarean section under subarachnoid block?
RCT (n=200)
Double-blind
Randomised
Does norepinephrine infusion improve maternal hemodynamics compared to phenylephrine in parturients undergoing caesarean section under subarachnoid block?
Norepinephrine infusion is as efficacious as phenylephrine for maintaining blood pressure during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery, but with a significantly lower incidence of bradycardia.
Norepinephrine infusion maintains SBP with less bradycardia than phenylephrine; leaves open whether it should supplant phenylephrine pending larger outcome trials.
Background and Aims: Phenylephrine is the vasopressor of choice in spinal anaesthesia–induced maternal hypotension. However, it results in reflex bradycardia and decrease in cardiac output (CO), an effect that is perhaps less evident with the use of norepinephrine. We sought to evaluate the effect of phenylephrine and norepinephrine infusion on maternal systolic blood pressure (SBP), heart rate (HR), intraoperative nausea vomiting (IONV) and fatal Apgar scores. Methods: A randomised double-blind study was conducted on 200 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) II–III parturients undergoing caesarean section under subarachnoid block (SAB) who were randomised to two groups A and B to receive variable rate, manually controlled infusions of phenylephrine and norepinephrine targeting maintenance of SBP to 100% of the baseline value. Maternal haemodynamics especially episodes of hypotension, IONV and vasopressor consumption were observed and recorded. Results: A statistically significant trend of lower SBP was observed during the first 6 min following intrathecal injection in group A ( P value – 0.000). Though a greater number of parturients experienced ≥1 episode of hypotension in Group A vs Group B (13% vs 9%), the difference was, however, statistically insignificant. The incidence of bradycardia was higher in group A than in group B (16% vs 1%) and was found to be statistically significant ( P < 0.05). The episodes of hypertension, IONV, maternal vasopressor consumption and neonatal Apgar score were comparable among both the groups. Conclusion: A dilute solution of norepinephrine infusion is comparably efficacious to the current gold standard vasopressor phenylephrine in maintaining blood pressure following spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery, with a significantly lower incidence of bradycardia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goel et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Maternal hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section (n=200). Norepinephrine infusion vs. Phenylephrine infusion was evaluated on Incidence of bradycardia (p=<0.05). Norepinephrine infusion maintained blood pressure comparably to phenylephrine during caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia, but with a significantly lower incidence of bradycardia (1% vs 16%, P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: