Key result
Norepinephrine maintained systolic blood pressure as effectively as phenylephrine (P=0.356), with better preserved cardiac output (P=0.014) and lower incidence of bradycardia (P=0.018).
Why the study?
Phenylephrine used for blood pressure maintenance during spinal anaesthesia can cause reflex bradycardia and decreased cardiac output, making norepinephrine a potential alternative due to its beta-adrenergic agonist activity.
Does norepinephrine improve cardiac output and maintain blood pressure compared to phenylephrine in term pregnant women undergoing caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia?
RCT (n=100)
Double blind
randomized
Does norepinephrine improve cardiac output and maintain blood pressure compared to phenylephrine in term pregnant women undergoing caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia?
p-value: p=0.014
Norepinephrine is as effective as phenylephrine for maintaining blood pressure during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery, but provides better cardiac output and less bradycardia.
Norepinephrine boluses may maintain SBP without phenylephrine-related bradycardia; leaves open optimal dosing and safety in larger trials.
: Currently phenylephrine is a preferred 1 line vasopressor for maintenance of blood pressure during spinal anaesthesia, may be associated with reflex bradycardia and decreased cardiac output, posing risk to mother or foetus. Norepinephrine may be an useful alternative as being potent alpha with weak beta adrenergic agonist activity. : This study compared the effectiveness of prophylactic and treatment boluses of norepinephrine and phenylephrine to maintain systolic blood pressure at or above 80% of baseline value during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery with the primary aim to compare cardiac output. Secondary aims were total doses of study drug required, neonatal outcome and perioperative complications. : Total 100, term pregnant women with ASA status II undergoing caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia were enrolled in this prospective, double blind controlled study. Patients were randomized to receive prophylactic bolus dose of norepinephrine (6 µg) or phenylephrine (100 µg) immediately after spinal anaesthesia. Systolic blood pressure, cardiac output and heart rate were monitored. Intermittent bolus doses were repeated whenever required. Student ‘t’ test and chi square test were used for analysing the data. : Both the drugs were able to maintain the systolic blood pressure ≥ 80% of baseline (p=0.356). Significant difference observed in cardiac output while comparing both the groups from 3 to 15 minutes after spinal anesthesia (p=0.014). The incidence of bradycardia was lower in norepinephrine group as compared to phenylephrine group (P=0.018). : Norepinephrine is as effective as phenylephrine for maintenance of blood pressure after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery with stable heart rate and cardiac output.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Desai et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia (n=100). Norepinephrine vs. Phenylephrine (100 µg prophylactic bolus) was evaluated on Cardiac output and maintenance of systolic blood pressure ≥ 80% of baseline (p=0.014). Norepinephrine maintained systolic blood pressure as effectively as phenylephrine (P=0.356), with better preserved cardiac output (P=0.014) and lower incidence of bradycardia (P=0.018).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: