Key result
Losartan reduced the relative risk for cardiovascular death by 11%, myocardial infarction by 25%, and new cases of diabetes mellitus by 25% compared to atenolol in patients with hypertension and LVH.
Why the study?
Previous studies showed association of elevated blood pressure with cardiovascular events but did not demonstrate superiority of one antihypertensive drug over another in reducing cardiovascular risk and death.
Does losartan reduce cardiovascular events compared to atenolol in patients with arterial hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy?
RCT (n=9,193)
double-blind
randomized
Does losartan reduce cardiovascular events compared to atenolol in patients with arterial hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy?
In patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy, losartan provides greater reductions in cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and new-onset diabetes compared to atenolol, suggesting benefits beyond blood pressure lowering alone.
Novel trial data suggest differential antihypertensive effects on CVE risk; leaves open confirmation in larger trials before practice change.
To lower blood pressure (BP) and its properly further maintenance are a main goal of antihypertensive therapy. Many large studies have provided strong evidence that there is an association of elevated BP with a risk for cardiovascular events (CVE), such as stroke, (S), myocardial infarction (MI), and heart failure (HF). But none of the studies has indicated that a drug is more effective than another one in reducing the risk for CVE and death. A recent LIFE study has demonstrated the indisputable advantage of the angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) of the first type losar-tan over the ß-blocker atenolol in patients with arterial hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). The study covered 9193 patients aged 55 to 80 years who had a diastolic BP of 95-115 mm Hg or a systolic BP of 160-220 mm Hg and ECG signs of LVH. The study was double-blind, randomized, and parallel. The patients received either losartan in a daily dose of 50-100 mg or atenolol in the same daily dose; if the target BP (< 140/90 mm Hg) was not achieved, hydrochlorthiazide and other antihypertensive drugs could be supplemented. The study lasted about 4 years. It revealed that the use of losartran caused a reduction in a relative risk for cardiovascular death by 11 %, MI by 25%, new cases of diabetes mellitus by 25% as compared to therapy based on the ß-blocker atenolol.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
I. Ye. Chazova (2003) conducted an RCT in arterial hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy (n=9,193). losartan vs. atenolol 50-100 mg daily was evaluated on cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and new cases of diabetes mellitus (11% relative risk reduction for cardiovascular death, 25% for MI, 25% for new diabetes). Losartan reduced the relative risk for cardiovascular death by 11%, myocardial infarction by 25%, and new cases of diabetes mellitus by 25% compared to atenolol in patients with hypertension and LVH.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: