Why the study?
Does losartan reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality compared to atenolol in patients with essential hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy?
Does losartan reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality compared to atenolol in patients with essential hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy?
The LIFE trial demonstrates that losartan is superior to atenolol for reducing cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients with LVH, challenging the use of beta-blockers as first-line monotherapy.
The recent Losartan Intervention For Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) study was conducted in patients with essential hypertension with electrocardiogram evidence of left ventricular hypertrophy. This showed that losartan compared to atenolol resulted in a significant reduction in the primary endpoint of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, as well as a greater reduction in electrocardiographically-defined left ventricular hypertrophy. Importantly, this was despite a mean blood pressure reduction which was similar in both groups. Furthermore, the atenolol arm was associated with higher incidence of newly diagnosed diabetics. The LIFE study has firmly confirmed a place for losartan (and other angiotensin receptor blockers) in the management of hypertension. Losartan has also been shown to be effective in diabetics and in patients with atrial fibrillation, as well as in left ventricular hypertrophy regression. This trial also raises the possibility that beta-blockers should perhaps not be used as first-line monotherapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nadar et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: