Key result
Real-time processing of ECG signals showed a high correlation with the post-event method for calculating heart rate variability indexes (Spearman values ≥ 0.9441, P<0.0001).
Why the study?
Heart rate variability is often analysed using short-term studies, but comparison of different recording methods in diabetic and control groups was needed.
Does a real-time method for recording short-term heart rate variability correlate with a post-event method in diabetic patients and controls?
Observational
Does a real-time method for recording short-term heart rate variability correlate with a post-event method in diabetic patients and controls?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Both real-time and post-event methods are suitable for short-term HRV analysis, with the choice depending on the need for ECG storage versus speed and cost.
Heart rate variability (HRV) is often analysed using short-term studies. Our objective was to compare two of them in a group of diabetic patients (reduced HRV) and in a control group. From the same 10 min surface electrocardiogram (ECG) two recordings were obtained. In one of them the whole signal was acquired through an A/D converter (post-event method). In the other (real-time method), an interface between the electrocardiograph and a parallel port of a computer was used to perform real-time processing of the ECG signal. The R-R intervals were measured after a visual validation in the post-event method. In the real-time method, the stored R-R intervals were automatically filtered. For both methods HRV indexes were calculated using the same software. The values of mean R-R intervals for each subject were almost identical regardless of the method. Accordingly, we found a high correlation between HRV indexes obtained from both methods (all Spearman values > or = 0.9441 and P < 0.0001). In addition, we found similar P values in the comparisons between the diabetic and control groups. We conclude that both methods are suitable for HRV analysis. Therefore, the selection of method can be based on other considerations such as the capability to store the ECG of the post-event method or the speed of analysis and lower cost of the real-time one.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Migliaro et al. (2004) conducted an observational in Diabetes. Real-time method for ECG processing vs. Post-event method was evaluated on Correlation between HRV indexes (Spearman ≥ 0.9441, p=<0.0001). Real-time processing of ECG signals showed a high correlation with the post-event method for calculating heart rate variability indexes (Spearman values ≥ 0.9441, P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: