Key result
Repository corticotropin injection cuts cost per response ~44% versus plasmapheresis or IVIg for MS relapses.
Why the study?
There is a lack of health economic studies on alternative therapies for acute exacerbations of multiple sclerosis.
Does Repository corticotropin injection (RCI) improve cost per response compared to Plasmapheresis (PMP) or intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse who fail on corticosteroid therapy?
Does Repository corticotropin injection (RCI) improve cost per response compared to Plasmapheresis (PMP) or intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse who fail on corticosteroid therapy?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Repository corticotropin injection may offer a more cost-effective alternative to plasmapheresis or IVIg for managing MS relapses after corticosteroid failure.
BACKGROUND: Relapses are common in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) even after the use of disease-modifying therapies. Repository corticotropin injection (RCI), plasmapheresis (PMP), and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) may be utilized as alternative therapies in the management of MS relapse. There is a lack of health economic studies on these alternative therapies for the acute exacerbations of MS. The objective of this study was to estimate the cost per response of RCI compared with PMP or IVIg from the United States (US) commercial payer perspective. METHODS: PMP or IVIg. One-way sensitivity analysis (OWSA) was conducted for both costs and response rates. All included costs were inflated to the 2019 US dollars. RESULTS: With a lower total annual cost of care and a higher response rate, RCI had a lower cost per response (US$141,970) compared with PMP or IVIg (US$253,331). RCI had a lower cost per response even when more stringent estimates for RCI were applied in the OWSA. The annual cost of care had a greater influence on the cost per response in the OWSA. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the estimates from the real-world evidence, our economic evaluation suggests that RCI may have real-world clinical and economic benefits for patients with MS relapse who fail on corticosteroid therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wan et al. (2020) studied Multiple sclerosis relapse. Repository corticotropin injection (RCI) vs. Plasmapheresis (PMP) or intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) was evaluated on Cost per response. Repository corticotropin injection had a lower cost per response ($141,970) compared with plasmapheresis or intravenous immunoglobulin ($253,331) for multiple sclerosis relapses.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: