Key result
Pre-existing AFib shows no link to 90-day functional outcomes after EVT for acute ischemic stroke.
Why the study?
The effect of atrial fibrillation on outcomes of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke is controversial.
Does atrial fibrillation affect functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing endovascular treatment?
Cohort (n=1,755)
Yes
Does atrial fibrillation affect functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing endovascular treatment?
Odds Ratio: 1.16 (95% CI 0.82–1.52)
Absolute Event Rate: 3% vs 3%
p-value: p=0.29
Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke yields comparable functional outcomes and safety profiles in patients with and without atrial fibrillation, supporting its use regardless of AF status.
Supports EVT regardless of AF status in AIS; observational data leaves open randomized confirmation of benefit.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The effect of atrial fibrillation (AF) on outcomes of endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is controversial. This study aimed to investigate the association of AF with outcomes after EVT in AIS patients. METHODS: Subjects were selected from ANGEL-ACT registry (Endovascular Treatment Key Technique and Emergency Work Flow Improvement of Acute Ischemic Stroke) - a prospective consecutive cohort of AIS patients undergoing EVT at 111 hospitals in China between November 2017 and March 2019, and then grouped according to having a history of AF or not. After 1:1 propensity score matching, the outcome measures including the 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, successful recanalization after final attempt, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) within 24 h, and death within 90 days were compared. RESULTS: A total of 1755 patients, 550 with AF and 1205 without AF, were included. Among 407 pairs of patients identified after matching, no significant differences were found in the mRS score (median: 3 vs. 3 points; P = 0.29), successful recanalization (87.2 vs. 85.3%; P = 0.42), symptomatic ICH (9. 4 vs. 9.1%; P = 0.86) and death (16.3 vs. 18.4%; P = 0.44) between patients with and without AF. CONCLUSION: The findings of this matched-control study show comparable outcomes of EVT in Chinese AIS patients with and without AF, which do not support withholding EVT in patients with both AIS and AF. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03370939 First registration date: 28/09/2017 First posted date: 13/12/2017.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tong et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion (n=1,755). Atrial fibrillation vs. Without atrial fibrillation was evaluated on 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.82-1.52, p=0.29). Pre-existing atrial fibrillation was not associated with a significant difference in 90-day functional outcomes compared to no atrial fibrillation in patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular treatment (OR 1.16).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: