Key result
Kinin B1 receptor antagonism was as efficient as angiotensin receptor 1 antagonism in reducing renal fibrosis in experimental obstructive nephropathy, but the combination therapy was not additive.
Why the study?
Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors are the only current antifibrotic therapy for CKD, and new antifibrotic molecules are needed to improve treatment.
Does a bradykinin B1 receptor antagonist reduce renal fibrosis as effectively as an angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonist in an experimental model of obstructive nephropathy?
Does a bradykinin B1 receptor antagonist reduce renal fibrosis as effectively as an angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonist in an experimental model of obstructive nephropathy?
B1R antagonism may offer an alternative antifibrotic therapy to RAS inhibitors in cases of poor tolerability, though combination therapy does not appear additive in severe models.
Hypothesis-generating for B1R antagonism as an antifibrotic alternative to ARB; prospective human trials needed before any clinical role.
BACKGROUND: Renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis is the pathological hallmark of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Currently, inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) remain the sole therapy in human displaying antifibrotic properties. Further antifibrotic molecules are needed. We have recently reported that the delayed blockade of the bradykinin B1 receptor (B1R) reduced the development of fibrosis in two animal models of renal fibrosis. The usefulness of new drugs also resides in outperforming the gold standards and eventually being additive or complementary to existing therapies. METHODS: In this study we compared the efficacy of a B1R antagonist (B1Ra) with that of an angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonist (AT1a) in the unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) model of renal fibrosis and determined whether bi-therapy presented higher efficacy than any of the drugs alone. RESULTS: B1R antagonism was as efficient as the gold-standard AT1a treatment. However, bitherapy did not improve the antifibrotic effects at the protein level. We sought for the reason of the absence of this additive effect by studying the expression of a panel of genes involved in the fibrotic process. Interestingly, at the molecular level the different drugs targeted different players of fibrosis that, however, in this severe model did not result in improved reduction of fibrosis at the protein level. CONCLUSIONS: As the B1R is induced specifically in the diseased organ and thus potentially displays low side effects it might be an interesting alternative in cases of poor tolerability to RAS inhibitors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huart et al. (2015) studied Renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis. Kinin B1 receptor antagonist (SSR240612) vs. Angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonist (Valsartan) or vehicle was evaluated on Reduction in renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis and macrophage infiltration (p=<0.05). Kinin B1 receptor antagonism was as efficient as angiotensin receptor 1 antagonism in reducing renal fibrosis in experimental obstructive nephropathy, but the combination therapy was not additive.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: