Key result
cTnT precision satisfies laboratory standards while other cardiac biomarkers like HCY show poor pass rates.
Why the study?
The status of internal quality control for cardiac biomarkers in China from 2011 to 2016 was investigated to understand measurement precision and set appropriate precision specifications.
Observational
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The precision performance of cTnT in Chinese laboratories was satisfactory, while other cardiac biomarkers, especially HCY, require continuous improvement in internal quality control.
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the status of internal quality control (IQC) for cardiac biomarkers from 2011 to 2016 so that we can have overall knowledge of the precision level of measurements in China and set appropriate precision specifications. METHODS: Internal quality control data of cardiac biomarkers, including creatinine kinase MB (CK-MB) (μg/L), CK-MB(U/L), myoglobin (Mb), cardiac troponin I (cTnI), cardiac troponin T (cTnT), and homocysteines (HCY), were collected by a web-based external quality assessment (EQA) system. Percentages of laboratories meeting five precision quality specifications for current coefficient of variations (CVs) were calculated. Then, appropriate precision specifications were chosen for these six analytes. Finally, the CVs and IQC practice were further analyzed with different grouping methods. RESULTS: The current CVs remained nearly constant for 6 years. cTnT had the highest pass rates every year against five specifications, whereas HCY had the lowest pass rates. Overall, most analytes had a satisfactory performance (pass rates >80%), except for HCY, if one-third TEa or the minimum specification were employed. When the optimal specification was applied, the performance of most analytes was frustrating (pass rates < 60%) except for cTnT. The appropriate precision specifications of Mb, cTnI, cTnT and HCY were set as current CVs less than 9.20%, 9.90%, 7.50%, 10.54%, 7.63%, and 6.67%, respectively. The data of IQC practices indicated wide variation and substantial progress. CONCLUSION: The precision performance of cTnT was already satisfying, while the other five analytes, especially HCY, were still frustrating; thus, ongoing investigation and continuous improvement for IQC are still needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Internal quality control of cardiac biomarkers. Internal quality control (IQC) of cardiac biomarkers was evaluated on Percentages of laboratories meeting five precision quality specifications for current coefficient of variations (CVs). From 2011 to 2016, the precision performance of cTnT in Chinese laboratories was satisfying, while other cardiac biomarkers, especially HCY, had frustrating pass rates against optimal specifications.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: