Key result
Uninterrupted warfarin during dental extraction is not linked to increased bleeding versus non-anticoagulated controls.
Why the study?
The incidence of bleeding complications after dental extraction in patients on oral anticoagulant therapy needed further assessment in a large multicentre study.
Does uninterrupted warfarin therapy with local hemostatic measures increase bleeding complications in patients undergoing dental extraction compared to non-anticoagulated controls?
Case-Control (n=900)
Yes
Does uninterrupted warfarin therapy with local hemostatic measures increase bleeding complications in patients undergoing dental extraction compared to non-anticoagulated controls?
Odds Ratio: 1.754 (95% CI 0.51–6.034)
Absolute Event Rate: 1.55% vs 0.89%
p-value: p=0.3727
Dental extractions can be safely performed in outpatients on uninterrupted warfarin therapy (INR 1.8-4) using local hemostatic measures, without significantly increasing bleeding risk.
Supports continuing warfarin for dental extraction without interruption; leaves open confirmation in larger randomized trials.
Following favourable results from a previous study, a large, multicentre, prospective, case-control study was performed to further assess the incidence of bleeding complications after dental extraction in patients taking oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT). Four hundred fifty-one patients being treated with warfarin who required dental extraction were compared with a control group of 449 non-anticoagulated subjects undergoing the same procedure. In the warfarin-treated group, the oral anticoagulant regimen was maintained unchanged, such that the patients had an International Normalised Ratio ranging between 1.8 and 4, and local haemostatic measures (i.e. fibrin sponges, silk sutures and gauzes saturated with tranexamic acid) were adopted. All the procedures were performed in an outpatient setting. Seven bleeding complications occurred in the OAT group and four in the control group; the difference in the number of bleeding events between the two groups was not statistically significant (OR=1.754; 95% CI 0.510 - 6.034; p=0.3727). No post-operative late bleeds requiring hospitalisation and/or blood transfusions were recorded, and the adjunctive local haemostatic measures were adequate to stop the bleeding. The results of our protocol applied in this large, multicenter study show that dental extractions can be performed easily and safely in anticoagulated outpatients without any modification of the ongoing anticoagulant therapy, thus minimising costs and reducing discomfort for patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maglione et al. (2010) conducted a case-control in Dental extraction (n=900). Uninterrupted warfarin therapy vs. Non-anticoagulated subjects was evaluated on Bleeding complications (OR 1.754, 95% CI 0.510 - 6.034, p=0.3727). Uninterrupted warfarin therapy during dental extraction did not significantly increase bleeding complications compared to non-anticoagulated controls (OR 1.754; 95% CI 0.510-6.034; p=0.3727).
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: