Key result
Carotid artery stenting achieves 100% technical success in high-risk surgical patients despite short-term neurologic complications.
Why the study?
Management of carotid artery stenosis in high-risk surgical patients is challenging, and immediate and short-term outcomes of carotid artery stenting in this group require evaluation.
Cohort (n=36)
Yes
Carotid artery stenting in high-risk surgical patients achieves high technical success but is associated with notable periprocedural and short-term cardiovascular and neurological complications.
High technical success with CAS in high-risk patients warrants caution given stroke/TIA rates; leaves open need for RCTs versus endarterectomy.
Aim To review the immediate and short-term results of carotid artery stenting (CAS) in high-risk patients for surgery. Patients and methods This prospective study was carried out on 36 patients experiencing significant CAS. Patients were scheduled for CAS during the period between December 2015 and June 2018 and followed up for 1 year. All procedures were done in 6 October Insurance Hospital and Mahmoud Mosque Specialized Hospital. Most carotid lesions were internal carotid artery [33 (91.7%) patients], and only three (8.3%) patients had common carotid artery lesions. Overall, 31/36 patients had symptomatic carotid stenosis, whereas 5/36 patients were asymptomatic. The commonest presentation was stroke (58.3%) and transient ischemic attack (27.8%). Results Technical success was achieved in all patients. Embolic protection devices were used in all cases. Three (8.3%) patients developed stroke; two patients had intraoperative stroke after stent deployment and the other occurred during the 12-month follow-up. One (2.8%) patient developed cerebral hemorrhage. Six (16.7%) cases developed transient ischemic attack. Acute myocardial infarction occurred in three (8.3%) patients. Conclusion Management of CAS is challenging in high-risk patients. Stroke prevention is the main goal of successful treatment. Risk–benefit assessment should be based on patient status and procedural risk, rather than on the controversy between carotid endarterectomy and CAS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ismail et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Carotid artery stenosis (n=36). Carotid artery stenting (CAS) was evaluated on Technical success. Carotid artery stenting in high-risk surgical patients achieved 100% technical success, with stroke occurring in 8.3% and transient ischemic attack in 16.7% over 1 year.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: