Key result
High social support linked to ~123% greater odds of high patient activation in women with CHD.
Why the study?
There is limited research exploring the impact of peer-led support models among women living with coronary heart disease.
Is high social support associated with higher patient activation in women with cardiovascular disease participating in peer-led support groups?
Cross-Sectional (n=157)
Yes
Is high social support associated with higher patient activation in women with cardiovascular disease participating in peer-led support groups?
Odds Ratio: 2.23 (95% CI 1.04–4.76)
p-value: p=0.012
High levels of social support in peer-led support groups are associated with greater patient activation and lower stress, anxiety, and depression in women with coronary heart disease.
High social support may aid activation in women with CHD; hypothesis-generating for peer-led interventions and should not yet change practice.
PURPOSE: Social support has been associated with beneficial effects on many disease states and overall health and well-being. However, there is limited research exploring the impact of peer-led support models among women living with coronary heart disease. This study describes the structure of peer-led support groups offered by WomenHeart (WH): The National Coalition for Women Living with Heart Disease, and assesses WH participants' quality of life and social, emotional, and physical health. METHODS: Participants were recruited from 50 WH groups. A 70-item online survey was administered, and the main analytic sample included 157 women. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the association between patient activation levels (lower activation levels: 1, 2 vs higher activation levels: 3, 4) and social support scores (range: lowest 8 to highest 34), adjusting for age. RESULTS: High levels of social support, patient activation, physical activity, and low levels of stress, anxiety, and depression were reported. Those who were at or above the median for the social support measures (indicating high levels of social support) had greater odds of high levels of patient activation (level 3 or 4) than individuals reporting low levels of social support (OR = 2.23; 95% CI, 1.04-4.76; P = .012). CONCLUSIONS: Women who regularly attended a support group by a trained peer leader were highly engaged in their health care and had low levels of stress, anxiety, and depression. These findings lend credibility to the value of the peer support model and could potentially be replicated in other disease states to enhance patient care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Witt et al. (2016) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary heart disease (n=157). High levels of social support vs. Low levels of social support was evaluated on High levels of patient activation (level 3 or 4) (OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.04-4.76, p=0.012). Among women with coronary heart disease, high levels of social support were associated with greater odds of high patient activation (OR 2.23; 95% CI 1.04-4.76; P=0.012).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: