Key result
Monthly support group meetings maintained higher levels of social support compared to usual care (ESSI score 17.18 vs. 14.45, p=0.008) among women with cardiac syndrome X.
Why the study?
Does group support improve psychosocial well-being and reduce primary-care demands in women with cardiac syndrome X?
RCT (n=49)
Does group support improve psychosocial well-being and reduce primary-care demands in women with cardiac syndrome X?
Absolute Event Rate: 17.18% vs 14.45%
p-value: p=0.008
Support group participation for women with cardiac syndrome X maintains social support and may reduce primary care visits and misconceived health beliefs.
Support groups may help sustain social support in women with cardiac syndrome X; extends RCT evidence for psychosocial interventions in this population.
BACKGROUND: Women with angina pectoris, a positive exercise electrocardiogram (ECG) for myocardial ischemia and angiographically smooth coronary arteries (cardiac syndrome X), are often characterized by unresolved symptomatology and a poor quality of life. Psychological morbidity and quality of life appear to be related to social support and social isolation. An investigation of group support as an aid to treatment for cardiac syndrome X was therefore undertaken. METHODS: Forty-nine women with cardiac syndrome X (mean ± standard deviation 61.8 ± 8 years) were randomized to 12 monthly support group meetings or usual care control. The Health Anxiety Questionnaire (HAQ), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), SF-36, York Angina Beliefs scale, ENRICHD Social Support Instrument (ESSI) and a demographic information scale, along with hospital admissions, general practitioner (GP) or cardiologist appointments were measured at baseline, 6 months and 12 months. RESULTS: Support group participants maintained higher levels of social support than controls (ESSI score, 17.18 ± 5.35 vs. 14.45 ± 6.98, p = 0.008). Near significant improvements in health beliefs total score (p = 0.068) and threat perception (p = 0.062) were found among the support group compared to the control; 29% of support patients had made one or more GP visits over the duration of the study, compared with 54% of the control group (p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: Support group participation maintains social support and may reduce health-care demands and misconceived health beliefs among patients with cardiac syndrome X.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asbury et al. (2010) conducted an RCT in Cardiac syndrome X (n=49). Support group meetings vs. Usual care was evaluated on Social support (ESSI score) (p=0.008). Monthly support group meetings maintained higher levels of social support compared to usual care (ESSI score 17.18 vs. 14.45, p=0.008) among women with cardiac syndrome X.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: