Key result
In utero T10 spinal cord transection in sheep causes sensory-motor paraplegia without neuronal connections.
Why the study?
Regeneration and functional recovery after spinal cord transection do not occur postnatally in mammals, and it is unknown if fetal spinal cord transection allows anatomic healing and functional recovery.
Does in utero transection of the fetal spinal cord result in anatomic healing and functional recovery in a mammalian model?
Does in utero transection of the fetal spinal cord result in anatomic healing and functional recovery in a mammalian model?
Unlike lower vertebrates, the fetal ovine spinal cord lacks spontaneous regenerative capabilities after midgestation transection.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Indicates limited fetal spinal plasticity after complete transection; leaves open whether regenerative strategies can succeed in human congenital defects.
OBJECTIVE: Regeneration and functional recovery after spinal cord transection do not occur in mammalian animals and humans postnatally. The goal of this study was to test whether in utero transection of the fetal spinal cord is succeeded by anatomic healing and functional recovery. METHODS: In five sheep fetuses, at 60 days of gestation and 75 days of gestation(term = 150 d), the spinal cord was completely transected at T10. The animals were delivered near term by cesarean section for clinical evaluation, measurement of cortical somatosensory evoked potentials, and morphological assessment. RESULTS: The newborn lambs demonstrated sensory-motor paraplegia, were incontinent of urine and stool, and exhibited a spinally generated, ambulatory pattern of the hindlimbs. No cortical somatosensory evoked potentials could be recorded in response to posterior tibial nerve stimulation, although potentials from the ulnar nerve, which enters the cord rostral to the lesion, were normal in all animals. Histologically, no neuronal connections across the transection site were identified. The cord proximal to the lesion was grossly normal, whereas distal to the transection, it appeared slightly smaller but with the cytoarchitecture preserved. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike in lower vertebrate and avian species, the fetal ovine spinal cord has no detectable spontaneous regenerative capabilities when transected during midgestation. Gap formation after transection, secondary posttraumatic cell death, and missing guiding channels for sprouting axons may be factors involved in the absence of any regenerative response.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meuli‐Simmen et al. (1996) studied Spinal cord transection (n=5). In utero complete spinal cord transection at T10 was evaluated on Anatomic healing and functional recovery. In utero complete spinal cord transection at T10 in sheep fetuses resulted in sensory-motor paraplegia and no histological neuronal connections across the transection site at near term.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: