Key result
LV inotropic reserve in Duchenne muscular dystrophy is linked to ~44% lower risk of depressed LVEF.
Why the study?
Duchenne muscular dystrophy is associated with dilated cardiomyopathy causing death in 40% of patients, and the predictive value of inotropic reserve for LV function trend over time was unclear.
Does the presence of inotropic reserve predict the preservation of left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy?
Cohort (n=69)
Does the presence of inotropic reserve predict the preservation of left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy?
Assessment of inotropic reserve using dobutamine infusion helps identify Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients at risk for progressive left ventricular ejection fraction deterioration.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Absence of inotropic reserve was associated with LVEF decline in DMD; leaves open whether dobutamine testing improves risk stratification.
AIMS: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), an inherited X-linked muscular disease, is associated with dilated cardiomyopathy that is responsible for death in 40% of patients. Our objective was to determine whether inotropic reserve is predictive of LV trend over time. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 69 DMD patients (age 12.2±2.3 years) were investigated. At baseline, LVEF and the presence of inotropic reserve (defined as an increase in LVEF >10% during dobutamine infusion) were investigated using radionuclide ventriculography. During follow-up (FU), LVEF was remeasured after a mean 29±19 months delay. In the whole population, mean LVEF was 58±8% at baseline and declined to 54±11% during FU (P =0.004). At baseline, 21 patients (30.4%) had LVEF <55% and 38 had no LV inotropic reserve. LVEF declined in the 38 patients (55.1%) without LV inotropic reserve (58±8% to 52±10%, P =0.001), and not in the other patients (58±8% to 57±11%, P =0.516) (P =0.042 for trends in LVEF between groups after adjustment for age, FU duration, and baseline LVEF). Fewer patients with vs. without inotropropic reserve at baseline show a depressed LVEF <55% during follow-up(35.5% vs. 63.2%, respectively, P =0.030). Similar findings were observed in the subgroups of patients with LVEF >45% or 55% at baseline. CONCLUSION: Inotropic reserve assessment allows the distinction of DMD patients who will vs. those who will not show a deterioration in LVEF, thus offering a sensitive approach for delineating the presence and progression of cardiovascular disease in these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goudot et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (n=69). Presence of left ventricular inotropic reserve vs. Absence of left ventricular inotropic reserve was evaluated on Depressed LVEF <55% during follow-up (p=0.030). The presence of left ventricular inotropic reserve in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy was associated with a lower rate of depressed LVEF <55% during follow-up.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: