Key result
Male sex in tricuspid regurgitation linked to ~46% higher risk of new PPM implantation vs females.
Why the study?
Tricuspid valve disease shows sex-specific differences in treatment outcomes and pathophysiology that require systematic investigation.
Does biological sex influence the development, progression, and treatment outcomes of tricuspid valve disease in adults?
Meta-Analysis (n=22,574)
Does biological sex influence the development, progression, and treatment outcomes of tricuspid valve disease in adults?
Relative Risk: 1.46 (95% CI 1.23–1.73)
p-value: p=<0.0001
In patients with tricuspid valve disease, males have worse baseline left ventricular ejection fraction and TR volume, and face a significantly higher risk of requiring permanent pacemaker implantation following surgical or transcatheter interventions compared to females.
Men with TR require more PPM after surgery or TTVR; extends evidence for sex-specific risk stratification in valvular management.
Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a heart condition where blood flows backward through the tricuspid valve. Tricuspid valve disease constitutes a major valvular heart condition that is receiving heightened attention due to tailored treatment options and sex-specific differences in treatment outcomes. The study aims to investigate whether biological sex has a significant influence on the development, progression, and treatment outcomes of tricuspid valve disease in adults. We conducted a comprehensive search to identify studies examining the impact of sex on the pathophysiology of TR as well as treatment outcomes in patients with TR. We searched PUBMED/MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE) from inception to September 2023 to identify relevant studies. Twelve studies totaling 22,574 patients met our eligibility criteria. These studies were categorized into three subgroups: patients with TR without intervention (3,848 patients, with 48.1% males and 51.9% females), those who underwent open heart surgery (17,498 patients: 46.2% males and 53.8% females), and those who underwent transcatheter tricuspid valve repair/replacement (TTVR; 1,687 patients: 41.6% males and 58.4% females). Analysis revealed no major differences in terms of TR etiology. Males tended to have a slightly lower mean age difference (mean difference (MD): -0.60 years; 95% confidence interval (CI) (-1.49, -0.04); p = 0.10) but had more frequent chronic lung disease (risk ratio (RR): 1.12, 95% CI (1.01, 1.25), p = 0.03). Males showed higher baseline TR volume (MD: 4.11, 95% CI (0.53, 7.68), p = 0.02) and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (MD: -5.85, 95% CI (-6.97, -4.73), p < 0.00001). Following open heart surgery for TR treatment, males required more frequent permanent pacemaker implantation (PPM; RR: 1.57, 95% CI (1.21, 2.03), p = 0.0006). Similarly, TTVR showed a higher need for PPM in males (RR: 1.45, 95% CI (1.10, 1.93), p = 0.010). In-hospital mortality exhibited no sex differences, but males had a slightly elevated late mortality risk. Sex differences in TR patients were notable in baseline characteristics, with males having a higher risk of certain conditions. The more frequent requirement for PPM was a major sex-based difference in terms of prognosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khan et al. (2023) conducted a meta-analysis in Tricuspid regurgitation (n=22,574). Male sex vs. Female sex was evaluated on Requirement of new permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation (RR 1.46, 95% CI 1.23-1.73, p=<0.0001). Male patients with tricuspid regurgitation had a significantly higher risk of requiring a new permanent pacemaker (RR 1.46) and a slightly elevated risk of late mortality (RR 1.16) compared to females.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: