Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The objectives of this study were to examine the association of personality disorder with outcome of depression in older patients (age > or = 60) treated in a psychiatric day hospital for depression and to compare the clinical diagnosis of personality disorder at admission with the results of a semi-structured interview at follow-up. Sixty-four patients were followed up for a mean interval of 30 (13-49) months after admission to the psychiatric day hospital and the semi-structured interview, Social Support Scale, Life Events Inventory, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and Mini-Mental State Examination administered by a psychiatrist blind to the details of the index admission. Forty-nine informants (a close friend or relative) were also interviewed using the semi-structured interview. Axis II diagnoses at the time of admission were determined from patient records. Personality disorder diagnoses were analysed according to DSM-III-R clusters. Twenty-one (33%) patients fulfilled criteria for personality disorder at admission and 23 (36%) at follow-up. There was strong agreement (k = 0.78) between patient and informant semi-structured interview results and moderate agreement (k = 0.41) between diagnosis at admission and at follow-up. Presence of a personality disorder, and in particular a cluster B personality disorder diagnosis was associated with chronic outcome of depression and with impaired social support. Personality is a significant factor in the outcome of depression in the elderly. It remains unclear whether current methods of assessment tap enduring characteristics, or manifestations of affective state.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vine et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: