Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The functionality of bovine milk during acid-induced gelation is governed by the interplay between protein genetic variants and the overall protein composition. This study evaluates the influence of bovine milk κ-casein (κ-CN; AA, AB) and β-casein (β-CN; A1A1, A1A2, A2A2) genetic variants on the microstructure and physicochemical properties of set and stirred yoghurts prepared from 5% (w/w) rehydrated skim milk. The κ-CN(AB) milk contained smaller casein micelles compared to κ-CN(AA), attributed to the larger surface area and higher proportion of κ-CN. Smaller micelles allowed more interaction points for whey protein complexation, leading to the formation of larger protein aggregates and a firmer gel network. This was associated with improved gel strength and lower syneresis after storage in set yoghurts, and increased resistance to shear in stirred yoghurts. While the β-CN genetic variants influenced initial acidification rates and kinetics, results suggest its influence was likely dependent on the β-lactoglobulin (β-Lg) to κ-CN ratio and it is hypothesised that the β-(A1) allele may facilitate more efficient early-stage acidification when β-Lg levels are limited. However, these differences in behaviour observed between milks of varying β-CN genetic variants were not sustained after 24 h of refrigerated storage, as the protein network continued to rearrange towards equilibrium. These results suggest the κ-CN genotype primarily governs yoghurt viscoelastic properties, while β-CN genotype may influence early-stage gelation kinetics. Results also indicate that yoghurt quality is best measured under refrigerated conditions and at least 24 h post-production as measurements taken during fermentation may not reflect the final consumer experience.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Logan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: