Why the study?
Fibrotic remnants after transvenous lead extraction, known as ghost material, can impair tricuspid valve function and cause progressive tricuspid regurgitation.
Case Report (n=1)
No
Highlights that residual fibrotic 'ghost material' after transvenous lead extraction can adhere to the tricuspid valve apparatus and cause progressive, massive tricuspid regurgitation nearly two decades later, necessitating long-term echocardiographic follow-up.
May prompt evaluation for ghost material in unexplained late TR after extraction; leaves open optimal surveillance protocols.
BACKGROUND: Moderate tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is seen as pathological and can result from atrial or ventricular dilatation or interaction with device leads. Rarely, fibrotic remnants after transvenous lead extraction (TLE), referred to as "ghost material", can impair tricuspid valve function. CASE SUMMARY: A 64-year-old woman presented with dyspnea and fatigue. Echocardiography revealed massive primary TR, with a flail-like appearance of the posterior leaflet caused by a linear mobile structure retracting the leaflet. During surgery, the structure was identified as remnant fibrotic material of previous TLE, causing progressive massive TR in the course of 20 years. DISCUSSION: After TLE, residual fibrotic remnants, referred to as "ghost material", when attached to the valve apparatus can lead to progressive TR, even after many years. TAKE-HOME MESSAGE: Long-term outpatient follow-up is essential after TLE, as TR may progress and "ghost material" may even further induce fibrosis on the valve apparatus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Atighetchi et al. (2025) conducted a case report in Massive primary tricuspid regurgitation due to fibrotic remnants ('ghost material') after transvenous lead extraction (n=1). Surgical beating-heart tricuspid valve replacement with 27-mm Edwards Mitris bioprosthesis was evaluated on Resolution of massive tricuspid regurgitation and symptom improvement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: