Key result
TLE shows no significant change in tricuspid regurgitation score, with severe TR in ~6%.
Why the study?
Few data exist regarding the effect of transvenous lead extraction on tricuspid valve function and the development of postprocedure tricuspid regurgitation.
Does transvenous lead extraction worsen tricuspid regurgitation in patients requiring lead removal?
Cohort (n=124)
No
Does transvenous lead extraction worsen tricuspid regurgitation in patients requiring lead removal?
Transvenous lead extraction is rarely associated with the development of clinically significant tricuspid regurgitation, though the risk is higher in older patients and those requiring removal of multiple leads.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports low TR worsening risk after extraction; leaves open prospective confirmation in higher-risk subgroups.
BACKGROUND: Few data exist regarding the effect of transvenous lead extraction (TLE) on tricuspid valve function. The objective of this study was to examine the effect of TLE on the development of postprocedure tricuspid regurgitation (TR). OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of TLE on tricuspid valve function. METHODS: A single center retrospective analysis of consecutive patients referred for TLE between June 2006 and November 2011. Patients were included only if they underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) before and after lead extraction (N = 124). Patients were assigned a preprocedure and postprocedure TR score on a continuous scale from 0 to 6 (0 = none, 1 = trace, 2 = mild, 3 = mild/moderate, 4 = moderate, 5 = moderate/severe, and 6 = severe). A clinically significant increase in TR was defined as both (1) an increase in TR score of at least two points, and (2) a postprocedure TR score ≥4 (moderate). RESULTS: A total of 124 patients referred for TLE underwent a TTE both before (9 ±16 months) and after lead extraction (4 ± 8 months). A total of 200 leads (1.6 ± 0.8 per patient) were extracted. The mean change in TR score after lead extraction was +0.18 (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.03 to 0.39, P = 0.11). A clinically significant increase in TR occurred in 7/124 (5.6% [CI 2.3-11.3%]) patients. Age ≥75 (+0.45, [CI 0.07-0.84, P = 0.02]), removal of ≥2 leads (+0.40 [CI 0-0.81, P = 0.05]), and powered sheath-assisted extraction (+0.34 [CI 0.05-0.62, P = 0.02]) were significantly associated with an increase in TR score. CONCLUSION: TLE is rarely associated with the development of clinically significant TR. In our cohort, patient age ≥75 years, pacemaker as opposed to ICD, and removal of ≥2 leads predicted worsening TR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coffey et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in Patients referred for transvenous lead extraction (n=124). Transvenous lead extraction vs. Preprocedure baseline was evaluated on Mean change in tricuspid regurgitation (TR) score (MD 0.18, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.39, p=0.11). Transvenous lead extraction was not associated with a significant mean change in tricuspid regurgitation score (MD 0.18; 95% CI -0.03 to 0.39; P=0.11), with clinically significant TR in 5.6%.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: