Key result
Cell phones and metal detectors do not affect ILRs, unlike MRI and electronic article surveillance.
Why the study?
Electromagnetic interference of implantable loop recorders (ILRs) by commonly encountered electronic devices and its clinical implications were not well characterized.
Does exposure to common electromagnetic sources cause interference in implantable loop recorders?
Comparison
Exposure to GSM cellular phones, EAS systems, MDGs, and MRI
Design
Observational evaluation of ILR interference
Authors
Loading...
RF EAS and MRI may disrupt ILR function; leaves open real-world risk and need for in vivo confirmation.
Observational (n=5)
Does exposure to common electromagnetic sources cause interference in implantable loop recorders?
Common electromagnetic sources like RF EAS and MRI can cause interference or irreversible errors in implantable loop recorders, requiring physician awareness.
COCK et al. (2000) conducted an observational in recurrent syncope (n=5). Electromagnetic sources (GSM, EAS, MDG, MRI) was evaluated on Electromagnetic interference. Cellular phones and metal detectors did not affect implantable loop recorders, whereas electronic article surveillance systems and MRI caused interference or irreversible errors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: