This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background: Surgical resection of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is associated with prolonged survival. However, there is a paucity of research investigating the long-term effects of the extent of lung resection on patients' quality of life. The aim of the study was to investigate the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after thoracoscopic anatomic lung resection (lobar and sublobar) for NSCLC. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected PROMs following thoracoscopic anatomic lung resection (lobar and sublobar) for NSCLC stages I-IIA. The primary endpoint was the change in physical function scores at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-surgery. Secondary endpoints included changes in patient-reported shortness of breath and coughing scores post-surgery between the two resection types. Results: A total of 57 patients were included in this study, with 26 patients undergoing lobar resection and 31 undergoing sublobar resection. The mean age was 71.4±8.3 years in the lobar resection group and 70.7±10.5 years in the sublobar resection group (P=0.77). There were no significant differences in the preoperative lung function tests between the two groups [mean forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) was 88%±17.1% in the lobar group and 83.4%±19.3% in the sublobar group, P=0.37]. The mean baseline physical functioning scores were 78±23 in the lobar group and 73±30 in the sublobar group (P=0.44). Changes in physical functioning scores did not differ significantly between lobar and sublobar resection groups (P=0.76) during the study period and up to 2 years after the surgery. Additionally, the type of lung resection had no effect on symptom scores for shortness of breath (P=0.24) or coughing (P=0.73). Conclusions: Patient-reported physical function, shortness of breath, and coughing did not significantly change from 3 months to 2 years following thoracoscopic anatomical lung resection in patients with NSCLC. The type of lung resection (lobar or sublobar) also had no significant effect on these outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hassan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: