Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of fixed-combination, dorzolamide-timolol prophylaxis in controlling intraocular pressure (IOP) following phacoemulsification surgery, while controlling for glaucomatous status. DESIGN: A retrospective chart review. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 558 patients undergoing phacoemulsification between September 5, 2023, and April 15, 2024, performed by a single surgeon. Only the first operated eye was included for bilateral surgeries, with 519 eyes analyzed in the study. METHODS: Patients were divided on the basis of a change in practice that occurred on December 31, 2023; all control eyes were obtained between January 1 and April 15, 2024, whereas all intervention eyes were obtained prior to this period. The control group received no prophylaxis (n = 233), and the intervention group received Cosopt immediately postoperatively (n = 286). Preoperative and postoperative day 1 (POD1) IOPs were measured using the iCare IC-100 tonometer. IOP readings ≥28 mm Hg were considered elevation spikes. Mean IOPs and spike incidences were statistically compared. RESULTS: Mean preoperative IOPs were identical (14.4 ± 3.1 mm Hg; p = 0.511). Mean POD1 IOP was significantly lower in the Cosopt group (13.7 ± 5.0 vs 18.4 ± 6.4 mm Hg; p < 0.0001). POD1 IOP spikes were less frequent in the Cosopt group (1.7% vs 9.9%; p < 0.0001). Cosopt was effective independent of glaucoma comorbidities (OR: 0.15; 95% CI: 0.06-0.42; p < 0.0002). Open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension (analyzed as a group: OR: 6.08; 95% CI: 1.72-21.54; p = 0.005) and narrow angles (OR: 6.54; 95% CI: 1.16-36.79; p = 0.03) were independent risk factors for IOP spikes. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic dorzolamide-timolol reduces mean postoperative IOP and POD1 pressure spikes, independent of glaucoma comorbidities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Valia et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: