Key result
Fabry disease patients show ~10% lower global myocardial work efficiency and reduced GLS versus controls.
Why the study?
Quantitative evaluation of left ventricular global and regional myocardial work in patients with Fabry disease by echocardiographic pressure-strain loop analysis was needed.
Does echocardiographic pressure-strain loop analysis detect impaired left ventricular global and regional myocardial work in patients with Fabry disease compared to healthy controls?
Observational (n=96)
No
Does echocardiographic pressure-strain loop analysis detect impaired left ventricular global and regional myocardial work in patients with Fabry disease compared to healthy controls?
Echocardiographic pressure-strain loop analysis can detect subclinical myocardial impairment in Fabry disease, demonstrating reduced global work efficiency and longitudinal strain that correlate with left ventricular hypertrophy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support early myocardial assessment in FD; leaves open PSL utility for risk stratification pending prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate the left ventricular global and regional myocardial work of patients in Fabry disease (FD) by echocardiographic pressure-strain loop (PSL) analysis. RESULTS: The study included 48 patients with FD and 48 healthy controls matched for age and sex. According to the presence/absence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), the patients with FD were divided into an LVH + group and an LVH- group. Left ventricular blood pressure was estimated noninvasively according to echocardiographic valvular events and systolic pressure in the brachial artery. Left ventricular myocardial work parameters were acquired by echocardiographic pressure-strain loop analysis. The FD groups had a significantly lower global longitudinal strain (GLS), global work index, global work efficiency (GWE), global constructive work and higher global waste work than the control group (P < .05). Regional analysis showed that all segmental myocardial waste work increased and myocardial work efficiency decreased in the LVH + group than in the LVH- group (P < .05). Segmental longitudinal strain, myocardial work index, and myocardial constructive work were markedly lower in the basal and middle segments (P < .05) and preserved in the apical segments. Multivariate analysis revealed that GWE and GLS were significant related to LVH. CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial work analysis can be used to assess global and regional myocardial work in patients with FD. In this study, GLS and GWE were reduced in patients with FD and associated with the presence of LVH. Basal and middle myocardial work decreased in relation to the LVH, while apical myocardial work remained, which added value to explore the distribution of myocardial impairment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Fabry disease (n=96). Fabry disease vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Global myocardial work efficiency (GWE) (p=<0.001). Patients with Fabry disease had significantly lower global myocardial work efficiency (85.81% vs 95.56%, p<0.001) and global longitudinal strain compared to healthy controls.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: