Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In vivo treatment with mAb directed against T cell surface molecules has been shown to prevent or reverse graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) and experimental autoimmune diseases, where T cells play a critical role. In this study we investigated the effects of in vivo administration of anti-I-A, anti-L3T4, and anti-lymphocyte function-associated Ag 1 (LFA-1) mAb on the development of murine cutaneous GVHD and delayed-type hypersensitivity responses evoked by local transfer of class II-MHC Ag-restricted, cloned autoreactive T cells. Prevention of cutaneous GVHD was achieved with local administration of either anti-L3T4 or anti-LFA-1 mAb, but not with anti-I-A mAb, while delayed-type hypersensitivity responses were inhibited by all the mAb. These results indicate that an I-A Ag-independent mechanism may be also operative in the development of the cutaneous GVHD, unlike the delayed-type hypersensitivity responses. Anti-LFA-1 mAb appeared to be more potent at inhibiting cutaneous GVHD rather than delayed-type hypersensitivity responses, whereas anti-L3T4 mAb inhibited equally both the responses. These results suggest that LFA-1 molecule may be involved in the epidermal invasion of T cells. Treatment with anti-LFA-1 mAb was found to be still, although less, effective at preventing cutaneous GVHD, even if the mAb was administered after the development of cutaneous GVHD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shiohara et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: