This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration (e[CO2]) often increases cereal yield, but can also decrease vegetative and grain tissue nitrogen (N) concentration that might affect future food and feed quality. However, data about CO2 x N interactions on key processes determining grain N yield and concentration, which are remobilization of vegetative N taken up before anthesis (Nrem) and post-anthesis N uptake (Nabs), are scarce. Therefore, a two-year Free Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) experiment was conducted with winter wheat grown under two CO2 (˜393 and 600 ppm) and three N levels (severe deficiency with N nutrition index (NNI) of 0.4, adequate with NNI of 0.8 and excess with NNI of 1.1). e[CO2] did not influence the allometric relation between aboveground N concentration and biomass up to anthesis. At anthesis, e[CO2] increased N acquisition of stem and ear, but not of leaf. Correspondingly, e[CO2] increased Nrem of stem and chaff. Moreover, e[CO2] enhanced the efficiency of Nrem of stem and aboveground plant in the first year, indicating increased N mobilization from vegetative tissue. Nabs tended to be increased by e[CO2], especially in the second year. Finally, e[CO2] increased grain N yield (8 to 12%), N use efficiency (13 to 18%) and N uptake efficiency (10 to 12%). Grain N concentration was slightly decreased by e[CO2] in both years (-1 to -6%), while grain N concentration was considerably larger (9 to 19%) in the second year compared to the first year. There was a strong linear relation between grain N yield and grain number (r2 = 0.98) that was not influenced by e[CO2], suggesting grain number as important factor determining the grain N yield increase under e[CO2]. Grain N concentration was more strongly affected by e[CO2] than mean N content per grain.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dier et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: