Key result
Simplified 100-point score using routine predictors discriminates prevalent hypertension with an AUC of ~0.80.
Why the study?
Hypertension is a major cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality globally, but validated population-based models and scores for prevalent hypertension remain limited.
Cross-Sectional (n=6,927)
Effect estimate: AUC 0.797 (95% CI 0.76-0.84)
p-value: p=<0.001
A locally developed and internally validated 100-point predictive score using routine clinical and demographic variables demonstrated good discrimination and calibration for identifying prevalent hypertension in the Qatari population.
May aid prevalent hypertension identification in Qatari adults; leaves open external validation and prospective utility.
Background Hypertension is a major cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality globally. Despite its high burden, validated population-based models and scores for prevalent hypertension remain limited. This study aimed to develop and internally validate a diagnostic model and scores to predict prevalent hypertension among adults in Qatar. Methods This population-based study included 6,927 adults aged ≥18 years with complete baseline data for hypertension status from the Qatar Biobank (QBB). A multivariable logistic regression model was developed using a randomly selected training cohort (70%; n = 4,835) and internally validated in an independent testing cohort (30%; n = 2,092). Model performance was evaluated for discrimination using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration using calibration plots and the Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, and stability via bootstrap resampling (1,000 replications). Regression coefficients were converted into simplified point-based scores to facilitate practical application. Results Overall, 1,097 (15.8%) participants had prevalent hypertension. The final model included predictors such as age, gender, nationality, body mass index, smoking, physical activity, sleep duration, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and cardiovascular diseases. The model demonstrated good discrimination, with AUCs of 0.803 (95% CI: 0.78–0.83) and 0.797 (95% CI: 0.76–0.84) in the training and testing cohorts, respectively. Calibration was satisfactory, with close agreement between predicted and observed outcomes and non-significant Hosmer–Lemeshow tests in both the training ( p = 0.102) and testing ( p = 0.393) cohorts. Bootstrap bias across all predictors was negligible, further supporting the model's stability. A simplified 100-point predictive score was derived from the final model to support practical classification of hypertension. Conclusion We developed and internally validated a population-based prediction model and simplified predictive score for prevalent hypertension in Qatar. The model demonstrated good discrimination, calibration, and stability. The model may support population-level hypertension stratification, targeted screening, and complication-preventive interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohammed et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Prevalent hypertension (n=6,927). Multivariable prediction model was evaluated on Model discrimination (AUC) for prevalent hypertension in the testing cohort (AUC 0.797, 95% CI 0.76-0.84, p=<0.001). A multivariable prediction model and simplified 100-point score using routinely available predictors demonstrated good discrimination for prevalent hypertension, with an AUC of 0.797 in the testing cohort.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: