Key result
Five-day variable priority attentional training produces robust speed and accuracy gains in older adults.
Why the study?
The construct validity of attentional control training tasks and the extent of transfer of training benefits to other contexts in older adults are unclear.
Does training attentional control using a variable priority strategy improve cognitive performance in healthy older adults?
Does training attentional control using a variable priority strategy improve cognitive performance in healthy older adults?
Effect estimate: η2 = 0.57 to 0.90
p-value: p=<.001
Training attentional control using a variable priority strategy improves speed and accuracy on the trained and analogous tasks, but does not broadly transfer to other processing speed measures.
Variable-priority attentional training should not yet alter practice for broad cognitive gains in older adults; leaves open task-specific effects pending larger trials.
Recent research has demonstrated benefits for older adults from training attentional control using a variable priority strategy, but the construct validity of the training task and the degree to which benefits of training transfer to other contexts are unclear. The goal of this study was to characterize baseline performance on the training task in a sample of 105 healthy older adults and to test for transfer of training in a subset (n = 21). Training gains after 5 days and extent of transfer was compared to another subset (n = 20) that served as a control group. Baseline performance on the training task was characterized by a two-factor model of working memory and processing speed. Processing speed correlated with the training task. Training gains in speed and accuracy were reliable and robust (ps <.001, η(2) = .57 to .90). Transfer to an analogous task was observed (ps <.05, η(2) = .10 to .17). The beneficial effect of training did not translate to improved performance on related measures of processing speed. This study highlights the robust effect of training and transfer to a similar context using a variable priority training task. Although processing speed is an important aspect of the training task, training benefit is either related to an untested aspect of the training task or transfer of training is limited to the training context.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anna MacKay‐Brandt (2011) studied Healthy older adults (n=105). Attentional control training using a variable priority strategy vs. Control group was evaluated on Training gains in speed and accuracy (η2 = 0.57 to 0.90, p=<.001). Attentional control training using a variable priority strategy for 5 days produced robust gains in speed and accuracy (p < 0.001) and transfer to an analogous task (p < 0.05) in older adults.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: