This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background and Objectives: Cesarean-Section can be life-saving; however, unnecessary procedures pose risks such as prolonged hospital stays, bleeding, and infections. This study aimed to analyze Cesarean-Section rates in a teaching maternity hospital operating Robson's Ten Group Classification System to identify distinctive patterns and factors associated with Cesarean-Section deliveries. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 500 women who delivered via cesarean section at a teaching maternity hospital in Erbil, Iraq, from January 2023 to January 2024. Data was collected through a questionnaire, medical chart reviews, and classification of births using the Robson’s Ten Group Classification System on a maternal basis. Characteristics of pregnancy and childbirth were studied. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 28, presenting results as rates, proportions, frequencies, and percentages. Results: The study found that the average age of participants was 29.20 years, and 99% of them were housewives. Urban residents constituted 71% of the sample. Most pregnancies were term (80%), with 27% primiparous and 68% multiparous. The highest Cesarean-Section rate was in the Robson 5 group (37%), indicating a high prevalence of recurrent Cesarean-Section. Primary indications for Cesarean-Section included fetal distress (22%) and malpresentation (13%). Conclusion: The TGCS specified key groups influencing Cesarean-Section rates, facilitating comparison and evaluation of interventions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hasan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: